State of Washington

Ethics Advisory Committee

Opinion 92-17

Question

Does the Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 2 permit a judicial officer to write a letter for the adult child of a family friend which would be used in the sentencing of the adult child in a federal court proceeding?

Answer

The following representations were made to the Committee: 1) the letter would be written on plain paper and the judicial title would not be used in the letter; 2) the letter would be addressed "To Whom It May Concern"; 3) the letter would be based on the judicial officer's personal observations of the family and the family's reputation in the community; and 4) the letter would be given to the adult child's attorney.
CJC Canon 2 requires that judicial officers avoid the appearance of impropriety in all of their activities. Canon 2B provides in part that a judicial officer should not lend the prestige of their office to advance the interests of others. Canon 2B goes on to provide that a judicial officer should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.

A judicial officer may not write a letter in connection with the sentencing of the adult child of a family friend. Writing such a letter, even under the conditions outlined above, creates an appearance of impropriety, lends the prestige of the office to advance the private interests of others and is analogous to voluntarily testifying as a character witness in judicial proceedings and therefore, is prohibited by CJC Canon 2.

The Supreme Court adopted a new Code of Judicial Conduct effective January 1, 2011. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

CJC 3.3
CJC 1.2
CJC 1.3
CJC 1.3 Comment [2]

Opinion 92-17

10/02/1992

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3